News : Are Kittens Better Than Kyle Sandilands?

Written by
March 28, 2012
Be Smart, News & Views
8 Comments

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has found that Kyle Sandiland’s on-air outburst against a journalist last year breached the radio code of practice.  Amazing, no?  They’re also taking steps to impose a license restriction on Kyle’s employer, 2DayFM which would

 ”prohibit the station from broadcasting indecent content and content that demeans women or girls”

2DayFM is fighting this restriction. For some reason. Austereo’s CEO, Rhys Holleran explains why.

“Our difficulty with the proposed licence condition is that terms such as decency, demeaning and undue emphasis on gender are broad and ambiguous and mean different things to different people.”

Dude. What the heck?  Just say YES. Just say SORRY.

(Wendy Harmer, radio maven and Hoopla doyenne, wrote a great insider’s-point-of-view piece about the Kyle Verdict today. You can read that here.)

Over here on JustB we feel very strongly about the need to stamp out this kind of circus-y, lady hating, mean spirited, PEOPLE hating nastiness.  I for one do not like Kyle Sandilands. (Remember our Letter To Jackie O?)  I feel very lucky to have only listened to his show twice, because I found it very alarming.  I have had a lucky escape, I reckon.

I think that we need to be vigilant about responsibility, accountability and imposing restrictions on shows like this to keep them in line when they waver into unsavory territory.  I am glad the ACMA is pursuing  such restrictions.

Radio can be awesome and compelling without vilifying people.  Call me old fashioned.  Maybe hire clever and funny people?  Maybe build an audience based on being innovative and entertaining and surprising?  Let’s raise our mugs to that.

I think with all that in mind, respectfully, we are much better off looking at kittens.  Here are some kittens, in honor of more inspired broadcasting and less oxygen for Kyle and his bile.  We think that kittens are way better than Kyle.

Here's a tabby kitten.

Here's a handful of kitten

Here is a fluffy grey kitten

This kitten is thinking about Kyle's show

 

What do you think about 2Day FM fighting the restrictions the ACMA wants to impose?  Do you think that terms such as “decency, demeaning and undue emphasis on gender” are open to wide interpretation?

Are kittens better than Kyle Sandilands?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michelle-Crawford/722309910 Michelle Crawford

    Aww those kittens are so cute Pip! I found them very distracting.  Sorry who were you talking about?  Oh never mind, I’ll just keep looking at the kittens.
    x

    • http://www.justbaustralia.com.au/ Pip @ JustB

      Kyle who? x

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1089966200 Rachel Patricia

    I totally reckon that the terms are open to interpretation because (a) I am a lawyer and that’s what we do ALL DAY; and (b) in this postmodern world everything is open to interpretation (or so Year 12 English taught me).

    But!  That does not mean that I agree with Kyle or 2Day FM.  I CANNOT stand the drivel Kyle and Jackie O try to pass off as entertainment.  In fact I find myself judging people a little bit if they are fans of the show and especially if the like that Kyle person  (OK, maybe I judge THOSE people a lot) .  I am not surprised that they are fighting the restrictions because Kyle is sure to breach them very soon.  Plus I think these people subscribe to the “Any Publicity is Good Publicity” rule.  That’s why Kyle is there, no?Frankly, it annoys me that there are enough people in this world who listen to the show to warrant 2Day keeping it on air.As for the kittens – good call.  They are WAY better than Kyle.  But, then again, A LOT of things are.  Minor surgery, stubbing your toe, recurring acne, getting acrylic nails ripped off, food poisoning, getting that puff of air in your eye at the optometrist -  all fall in the category of things that are better than him.

    • http://www.justbaustralia.com.au/ Pip @ JustB

      You are so right, Rachel. It really is a case of any publicity is good publicity. I am very much looking forward to the 2DayFM stunt were Kyle puts a sock in his mouth and scuba dives in a very deep pond of contrition. Until then, it’s kittens for me.

  • http://twitter.com/ruthbruten GourmetGirlfriend

    It says WAY too much about said radio station that they are fighting the restrictions.

    I mean really?!
    Come on!!!!What is this? 1952?
    Moving right along to the 21st century dudes!
    I have NEVER listened to this radio station & feel happy that I personally have missed out on hearing ANY of this bilious misogynist tripe first hand.
    However I don’t feel happy that there is a generation of peeps growing up hearing it and thinking it is OK. 
    It isn’t.
    On ANY level.
    Thank goodness for ACMA.
    Oh dear to 2days response!
    Their response reads to me….. “Our difficulty with the proposed licence condition is that we seem to have an inability to think with moral aptitude and this licence restriction would require us to act with integrity. That seems very very hard for us & would require a complete change of behaviour. Clearly we aren’t able to acknowledge any wrong.”
    Not. Good. Enough.
    I REALLY REALLY hope that ACMA are successful in enforcing these licence restrictions. 
    I’ll be staring at the blue eyes of the pair of kittens in top pic while this plays out…….

    • http://www.justbaustralia.com.au/ Pip @ JustB

      Kitteh! (Thanks GG for your view, it is always super interesting to read your take on things.) x

  • Daydreamlily

    yes I would rather watch funny cat videos on youtube than listen to Kyle’s show.  While I think restrictions are needed and absolutely do not condone his comments or behaviour.   I do worry that the terms “decency, demeaning and undue emphasis on gender” are vague and can easily be manipulated and argued on in a court of law. Then again, that is almost the entire justice system, and what law makers and policy makers do, they like to keep it vague and open to interpretation.  But without a grounds or wording to go off, you have no case to bring against Kyle to begin with.  If that makes any sense.

    in short, lets all vote with our listening power and swtich Kyle off. I’m sure low ratings and numbers will get rid of him sooner than any restrictions.

    • http://www.justbaustralia.com.au/ Pip @ JustB

      Yes! And let’s listen to cats instead. VERY good points you have made, Liss. Thank you. x